Showing posts with label climate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label climate. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 29, 2026

Why wildfires seem to be worse in Europe than in the global south although temperature and droughts are less

Wildfires have become an increasingly alarming phenomenon in Europe, where recent years have seen a surge in fire activity that contrasts sharply with trends in the global south. Regions such as Africa and South America, despite experiencing higher temperatures and more severe droughts, have not witnessed a comparable escalation in wildfire severity. This article explores the ecological, climatic, and human factors that contribute to this paradox, revealing why Europe's wildfire challenges are uniquely intense.


 

The Surge of Wildfires in Europe

Europe's wildfire increase is driven by a multifaceted set of factors. Decades of fire suppression policies combined with rural land abandonment have led to dense forests and thick underbrush, creating large accumulations of dry biomass. This buildup of fuel becomes highly flammable during heatwaves, resulting in fires that are more intense and difficult to control.

Climate change has further exacerbated fire weather conditions in Europe, with prolonged heatwaves, lower humidity, and more frequent days of high fire danger. These climatic shifts increase both the likelihood and severity of wildfires.

Moreover, Europe's dense population, extensive infrastructure, and high levels of tourism contribute to a greater number of human-caused ignitions, further elevating wildfire risk.

Fire Regimes in Africa and South America: A Contrast

In contrast, Africa and South America have experienced a decline in total burned area, despite higher temperatures. This is largely due to different fire management practices and ecological conditions.

In Africa, traditional and managed fires occur frequently but at low intensity, preventing the buildup of large fuel loads and maintaining fire-resistant landscapes. South America's agricultural expansion reduces wildfire risk by converting natural landscapes into cropland, which does not accumulate flammable fuel.

Savanna ecosystems in these regions experience predictable, seasonal fires that are fast-moving and low-intensity, preventing the accumulation of dense fuel typical of European forests.

Higher humidity, regular rainfall cycles, and vegetation adapted to fire also contribute to less extreme ignition conditions despite elevated temperatures.

Understanding the Paradox

The paradox of more severe wildfires in Europe despite lower temperatures is explained by the interplay of fuel load, fire management, and ecological context rather than temperature alone. Europe's landscapes have become more fire-prone due to fuel accumulation and weaker fire management, while Africa and South America maintain fire regimes that reduce extreme wildfire risk.

Region

Temperature

Fuel Load

Fire Management

Fire Trend

Europe

Lower

High (due to abandonment, suppression)

Weak

Increasing

Africa

Higher

Low (frequent low-intensity burns)

Strong

Decreasing

South America

Higher

Moderate to declining (agriculture)

Moderate

Decreasing

Ecological Insights: Soil and Nitrogen Cycling

Europe’s soils are becoming increasingly oxygen-rich due to drought and microbial collapse, which leads to higher flammability. In contrast, soils in Africa and South America maintain higher microbial activity and more stable nitrogen cycling, contributing to less flammable forest floors.

Strategies to Mitigate Wildfires in Europe and North America

To reduce wildfire risk without compromising forest expansion, several strategies can be employed:

  1. Prescribed and Cultural Burning: Implementing low-intensity, frequent burns to reduce fuel loads.

  2. Mosaic Landscapes: Designing landscapes with mixed age classes and non-flammable breaks to disrupt fuel continuity.

  3. Targeted Fuel Management: Thinning dense stands and removing dead wood near communities.

  4. Fire-Literate Communities: Educating the public to reduce ignitions and support fire management.

  5. Nitrogen and Drought Management: Reducing nitrogen deposition and promoting soil health to decrease flammability.

These approaches emphasize a shift from fire suppression to stewardship, integrating ecological understanding with community engagement and policy.

Conclusion

The paradox of more severe wildfires in Europe despite lower temperatures highlights the complex interplay of ecological, climatic, and human factors. Effective wildfire risk management requires holistic strategies that consider fuel dynamics, fire regimes, soil health, and social dimensions to foster resilient landscapes and communities in a changing climate.

References:

  • US News. Wildfires Are More Extreme in Europe and North America, but Global Burning Is Oddly Decreasing

  • ScienceDirect. Has the fire weather index emerged? Insights from global and regional climate models

  • European Forest Institute. Wildfire risk planning and prevention. Innovations in the Mediterranean and beyond

  • International Association of Wildland Fire. Recommendations for Change: The Way Ahead for a Fire-Literate and Fire-Adapted Europe

  • firelogue.eu. September 2025 Policy Brief

  • ScienceDirect. Consequences of nitrogen deposition and soil acidification in European forest ecosystems and mitigation approaches

Sunday, January 9, 2022

Transforming the Food System - COP26

Event: We Are Zero Nation! by the Scottish Communities for Climate Action Network - COP26

🧩 Gihan Soliman – Transforming the Food System through Green Innovation, Conservation and Sharing Economy

Gihan Soliman is a food scientist and a soil scientist concerned about transforming the food system toward sustainable abundance. Soliman is a Trustee of the Permaculture Association Britain and a coordinator for the International Permaculture Network in Africa, Mediterranean, and the Middle East (IPNAMME); She believes that solutions come from the people. Soliman devised multiple actions reliant on green innovation, conservation, and environmental activism. She established the Gigi Moringa Ltd to harness the power of Moringa, pulses, fungi, and quinoa in one vegan food-product for integration into the daily diet. Moringa provides highly nutritious food plus other economical, medicinal and environmental services while standing in the soil holding it together and providing shelter for wildlife as well as storing carbon. Soliman is also working, among other scientists, on a quinoa-associated fungi biodiversity project in the Andes to protect biodiversity in habitats that might get affected by quinoa food production, for healthier and sustainable ecosystems.






















Wednesday, May 6, 2015

How far can our kind be trusted on geoengineering?


 How far can our kind be trusted on geoengineering?
A multi-disciplinary account of global governance issues in light of Holistic Darwinism

Peer-reviewed

Gihan Sami Soliman


International-Curricula Educators Association




07/05/2015




Would a human kind comprising an estimated number of 700 million of hungry people (WFP, 2014), while wasting one third of its food be entrusted on geoengineering the climate for ecological restoration? The humanity complaining today about the depletion of fossil fuel and global warming, while the little bit of sunlight falling on earth for one hour meets the world's energy demands for an entire year?! (Inslee et al, 2008). How much of today's hunger, misery and fears are all about politics and governance? Perhaps the greatest deal!


          Fears of a man-made doomsday has been lingering there for a few decades, expressed in several forms and cultures (Preston, 2012; Ginn, 2015); but officially by the publication of the “Limits to Growth” – 1972 (Hall, 2009). This seems to have been pushing humanity away from the “individualism” (Encyclopaedia Britannica) associated with the Laissez-faire economy of the traditional liberalism, justified at a time by what is known as the “Social Darwinism”, towards a sort of global solidarity enthusiasm – at least in principle.


[[ Read the whole paper ]]






What is this about?

Each science domain expresses geoenigneering in a different way, and in different jargons. I integrated the different perspectives together, expressed in one simple language. The conclusion is that we have been already been manipulating the ecology for decades, by manipulating nature's fundamentals, till we've reached the current accumulative situation. As an educator, I plan my lesson in line with the objectives defined by the Bloom's Taxonomy. In the psychomotor dimension of the Blooms Taxonomy, and at its highest level, there is manipulation! Manipulation of Nature's fundamentals is what we teach our children to be good at, on a vocational level. So it is only the level of awareness and the consensus on the convenient action that makes today's proposed "geoengineering" called as such, not the action itself. This consensus is the real problem! Science says that decreasing atmospheric carbon dioxide today will not alone solve the problem, and governments might have to take actions in case of emergency, if the weather takes a sudden dangerous turn. But because there is a trust issue, and lack of science integration - to help us see the whole picture, we are reluctant to discuss it or study it further. This paper presents an integrated vision of the case and calls for more studies on geoengineering.



 


Related:

By Gihan Sami Soliman
About the blogger